body fat: 37.68 (-0.39%, down from about a week ago - really justu a rounding error)
http://www.linear-software.com/online.html.
Previous body fat by three site method was 37.49%. So, the numbers are all very similar.
Numbers:
C 53
S 62
T 17
data 09-08-2020 / data from 07092020)
N: 18.375 / 20.875 (-2.500 in)
b: 14.750 17.250 (-2.500 in)
c: 55.500 / 58.500 (-3.000 in)
uw 52.500 / 56.625 (-4.125 in)
lw: 48.500 / 50.500 (-2.000 in)
H: 48.50
T: 26.750 / 25.500 (+1.250 in)
calf: 17.25 / 18.375 (-1.125 in)
note virtually no change from 082502020.
data review
measurements 08252020
n: 19.625 (0) / (-1.250")
chest: 54.625 (-0.875") / (-3.875")
biceps: 16.00 (+0.125") (-1.250")
upper waist 52.625 (-2.000") / (-4.000")
lower waist: 47.500 (-1.00) / (-3.000")
hips: not measured
thigh: 24.375 (0) / (-1.125")
calf: 17.250 (-1.250) / (-1.125")
body fat: 38.07% three site method here http://www.linear-software.com/online.html. Previous body fat by three site method was 37.49%. So, this is 0.58 greater -- but they're functionally the same number -- andwell within my margin of error.
Numbers:
C 51
S 60
T 23
data 09-04-2020 / data from 07092020)
N: 19.750 (-1.125)
c: 54.500 (-4.000)
b: 14.750 (-2.500)
uw 53.500 (-3.125)
lw: 48.500 (-2.000)
t: 26.750 (1.250)
calf: 18.500 (+0.125)
note virtually no change from 082502020.
data review
measurements 08252020
n: 19.625 (0) / (-1.250")
chest: 54.625 (-0.875") / (-3.875")
biceps: 16.00 (+0.125") (-1.250")
upper waist 52.625 (-2.000") / (-4.000")
lower waist: 47.500 (-1.00) / (-3.000")
hips: not measured
thigh: 24.375 (0) / (-1.125")
calf: 17.250 (-1.250) / (-1.125")