data - 09092020

body fat:  37.68 (-0.39%, down from about a week ago - really justu a rounding error)  

 http://www.linear-software.com/online.html. 

Previous body fat by three site method was 37.49%.  So, the numbers are all very similar. 

Numbers:  

C 53

S 62

T 17

data 09-08-2020 / data from 07092020)

N: 18.375 / 20.875 (-2.500 in)

b: 14.750   17.250 (-2.500 in)

c: 55.500 / 58.500 (-3.000 in)

uw 52.500 / 56.625 (-4.125 in)

lw: 48.500 / 50.500 (-2.000 in)

H: 48.50

T: 26.750 / 25.500 (+1.250 in)

calf: 17.25 / 18.375 (-1.125 in)

note virtually no change from 082502020.  

data review

measurements 08252020

n: 19.625 (0) / (-1.250")

chest:  54.625 (-0.875") / (-3.875")

biceps:  16.00 (+0.125") (-1.250")

upper waist 52.625 (-2.000") / (-4.000")

lower waist: 47.500 (-1.00) / (-3.000")

hips:  not measured

thigh:  24.375 (0) / (-1.125")

calf: 17.250 (-1.250) / (-1.125")

body fat:  38.07% three site method here  http://www.linear-software.com/online.html. Previous body fat by three site method was 37.49%.  So, this is 0.58 greater -- but they're functionally the same number -- andwell within my margin of error.  

Numbers:  

C 51

S 60

T 23

data 09-04-2020 / data from 07092020)

N: 19.750 (-1.125)

c: 54.500 (-4.000)

b: 14.750 (-2.500)

uw 53.500 (-3.125)

lw: 48.500 (-2.000)

t: 26.750 (1.250)

calf: 18.500 (+0.125)

note virtually no change from 082502020.  

data review

measurements 08252020

n: 19.625 (0) / (-1.250")

chest:  54.625 (-0.875") / (-3.875")

biceps:  16.00 (+0.125") (-1.250")

upper waist 52.625 (-2.000") / (-4.000")

lower waist: 47.500 (-1.00) / (-3.000")

hips:  not measured

thigh:  24.375 (0) / (-1.125")

calf: 17.250 (-1.250) / (-1.125")